100% All-Natural Composition
No Artificial Intelligence!
Showing posts with label lgbtwhatever. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lgbtwhatever. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 04, 2025

LGBT Extremism: Not so much "pride" anymore

Have you noticed it also?

There doesn't seem to be the degree of "pride" that there has been in the previous few months of June.

"El-Jee-Bee-Tee-Cue Pride" has been a thing for the past number of decades among the extremists of that lifestyle.  And then following the first election of Donald Trump it found renewed life as supposed "opposition" to the administration.

Then Trump's first term ended.  And the real freak show that was the Biden years began.

Thankfully, most of the American people got fatigued by pretty much everything wacko liberal.  Enough to toss leftism out on its keister.  Right now the only vestige of power that it still has are in the out-of-control federal judges who are imperiling rule of law, sheerly out of a lust to "get Trump" by any means possible.

I was expecting that this June would witness a resurgence of "pride".  A counter-revolution to the "Make America Great Again" movement that propelled Trump to a second term in the White House.  The leftists were going to rally around the cause of LGBT again, regather their forces, throw in the reserves...

...but so far, nothing.

Oh, there have been a few adherents of LGBT ideology who have stuck with it.  A few nights ago I watched A Face in the Crowd, the 1957 movie that was Andy Griffith's first role.  By the end of the film Griffith's character, the "demagogue in denim" Lonesome Rhodes, has been destroyed by his own ego.  Mel Miller (played by Walter Matthau) tells Rhodes that he'll get another show, "but it won't be the same."  There will be a few people who will still watch him after he's ruined his seemingly invincible hold on the public.  But those will eventually disappear too.  And then there will be no one.

That's what the LGBT cause reminds me of.  Lonesome Rhodes.  Screaming in the night for some slight measure of legitimacy and respect.

I'll dare say that the days of LGBT's hold on the business world are over with.  Those active in the movement have had their time.  They've been weighted in the balances of corporate esteem and found wanting.  The court of public opinion is no longer in their favor.  No matter how much gay-friendly beer and "trans swimwear" they might boast of selling.

If only the LGBT extremists had kept low all this time.  They may not have become so reviled by the majority of the American people.

Especially by many of those who do identify as gay and lesbian.

Because it wasn't so long ago the LGBT community wanted to be left alone.  They wanted to live in quiet with others.

A lot of homosexuals and lesbians still prefer quiet.  I believe that there should be no grievance to be had with them, at all.  They respect my right to my beliefs and I respect their privacy.  There is a line that should never be crossed and so long as it isn't there can be peace.


But those aren't the ones involved with "LGBT Pride".


First the LGBT fringe was quiet.


Then they asked for "tolerance" and "acceptance".


Then they insisted that they be "loved" no matter what they were doing to destroy themselves.


And now it is "Pride" that DEMANDS SUBSERVIENCE It has come to be that we must all fall in line and surrender to the cause of LGBT or suffer "consequences" (they love to use that word).  That is what Pride has morphed into.


The "LGBT Pride" movement is not and never has been about peaceful "live and let live".  It has always been about coercion.  It is about forcing people against their conscience.  It is "capitulate to us or ELSE".  It is "obey or BE DESTROYED!"


The extremist LGBT movement is like most other things leftist.  A dark iron fist beneath a tattered velvet glove.  They are bullies hiding behind a rainbow flag (or purple and lavender flag, or whatever).


Too many of the LGBT extremists also want to pervert our children.  It's the only way they are going to perpetuate themselves, by making the most innocent among us like them.  They're the ones often called "the groomers".  And they are for all intents and purposes irredeemably evil.


There is nothing virtuous or noble to be "proud" about in homosexuality and its associated lifestyles.  It is a thing of destruction: of others, of culture, and inevitably of one's healthy mind and body.


But that is the choice of homosexuals and lesbians and bisexuals.  Don't get me started on transgenderism: as much an affront to nature and society as there is ever apt to be.


If someone wants to partake of a lifestyle that invites disease, madness and death, then there is little I could do to persuade them otherwise.  But do NOT assume that I or any other conscionable human being must be compliant and give our consent and blessing to such behavior.


Now, can there truly be "peaceful co-existence" between most people and those of the radical LGBT agenda?  It's very doubtful.  The LGBT zealots have to earn our respect.  And they aren't doing that.


Thugs and bullies never do.


But if this year is any indication, "LGBT Pride" is fast losing its luster.  The velvet glove is now shreds of remnant.  Extreme liberalism has been revealed for all to see as the brute power-at-all-costs that it really is, and people are wiser now.  If this past autumn's elections were any indication (and in a historic first, President Trump's approval ratings at this point in his term are higher than that of any other president at similar times) the LGBT movement no longer has any legitimacy.  It is being buoyed pretty much by left-leaning media: another institution that is losing its power.  When CNN's viewers are numbered in the hundreds of thousands while Joe Rogan's podcast gets an audience in the tens of millions, there has been a drastic shift away from the mainstream press's hold on the American people.


So if you are seeing "Pride" on display this month, and detest the wickedness that it stands for, take heart.  These are the last days of that movement as it has been defined in the past few decades.  At least until - hopefully a long time in the future - another leftist regime is installed and the LGBT extremists - who a lot of homosexuals want nothing to do with - come out of hiding once again.


Sunday, August 21, 2022

New Substack: Words of dire warning about transsexuality

Just made a new post on my Substack at christopherknight.substack.com.  I don't know who originally wrote this.  But I found it this morning and it resonated greatly with me in regard to some things I've seen firsthand about transsexuality.  It is with a seething rage that I am witnessing what is being done to kids in the name of "gender fluidity".  The youth are being told lies and getting persuaded to do irreparable harm to their bodies and in the process their minds and souls.  By the time they realize what has been done to them it is too late.

Maybe this will come as not only words of warning but also wisdom, to any person considering "transitioning" to a male or female.  Because the long and short of it is, it's not possible to do that and it's madness to try.  Perhaps this will be found by a young man or woman who is being given smooth-sounding words about their "real identity".  I hope this will make them pause and consider what it is that they are contemplating doing to themselves.

From the short essays I came upon:

You will never be a real woman. You have no womb, you have no ovaries, you have no eggs. You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and surgery into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.

All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your ghoulish appearance behind closed doors.

Click here for more.
 

Friday, August 05, 2022

No, I do not "hate" anyone LGBT

Sigh...

I shouldn't have to make this post.  But as it seems how EVERYTHING today is supposed to be qualified, quantified, factionalized and most especially sexualized...

Contrary to what some have claimed, I do not now nor have I ever harbored any kind of hatred toward those who have chosen the homosexual lifestyle.  Or who are bisexual.  Or transsexual.  Or whatever.

As a Christian, I am called to not hate anybody.  I am in fact commanded to hate my own sin and my own fallen carnal nature, before I dare levy hatred toward another.  It is part and parcel to the "dying unto self" that those who follow Christ are told that they must do on a daily basis.

That does not mean however that I can or must acquiesce to any activity that is self-destructive.

And that, is what LGBT behavior is.

I've seen the damage and disease and ultimately death that is wrought by homosexuality.  Have looked at the photos of lacerated anal tissue.  Viewed images of penises wracked with things that no healthy male should have.  I have read the journal articles, about gay men and lesbians being far more prone to cancer than those who are not.  Human papillomavirus is a really nasty thing to subject one's genitalia to.  I have looked into the faces of people who have contracted full-blown AIDS, and those are eyes that I pray I never have to look into ever again.

Homosexuals have, on average, a lifespan twenty years shorter than that of heterosexuals.

Let that sink in.  A gay or lesbian person is likely to have two full decades shaven off their life expectancy, because of the all too physical consequences of homosexual behavior.

These are not things that can be "wished away" for sake of sexual license.  These are stone cold hard facts.  This is reality, that can NOT be escaped from because of one's "feelings" about the matter.

LGBTwhatever is incompatible with human design.  Its myriad of associated diseases and disorders attest to this.

How do I, as a person called by God Himself to love others, reconcile that love with the expectation that I am to celebrate a "lifestyle" that leads so very often to death?

I can not.  I can no more endorse the LGBT community than I can endorse cigarette smoking, or abusing crystal meth.  Because those are self-destructive behaviors also.

I can love homosexuals.  I can love lesbians. I can love bisexual individuals.  I can love transsexuals, though what they do to themselves is especially haunting.

But as a Christian (who fails and falls more often than not), as an objectivist who understands the concreteness of reality, as merely a human being trying to be decent... for those reasons and more, I can not love their kind of behavior.  Because when you scrape away everything else that's Chris Knight, you're left with someone who simply does not want to see anyone die.

No, "love is love" is not true.  There are many kinds of love.  There is philios: love of brothers and sisters.  There is the love of parents to children.  There is logos: the love of God.  And, yes, there is eros: love expressed sexually between man and woman.

What the LGBT community and its supporters demand we accept is not love at all.  It is lust.  And they want said lust to be without the burden of personal responsibility.  And THAT again is a denial of reality.

If you love a person... and I mean really love someone, you will NOT selfishly lead that person to demean themselves for your own desires, at risk of their health and even very life.

I love my friends.  There are men who are as close and dear to me as real brothers.  I love them and I would die for any of them.  But not for an instant have I been tempted to take it to an entirely different and inappropriate level.

Once upon a time, not very long ago, most men and women were capable of accepting that.  That love is a many dimension-ed notion and that each kind had its own unique place in the scheme of things.

We were a better people, then.  Not a perfect people.  But we were at least striving against the baser instincts of carnal nature.  And we accomplished great things because of it.

As a historian, I know also where unrestrained sexual pleasure leads a society to.  And that as much as anything else persuades me about the truly insidious nature of the LGBT lifestyle.

I could easily sit here all night, and rattle off a dozen reasons and more why I can not celebrate homosexuality and transgenderism.  Just as easily as I could tick off all the reasons why I must condemn it.

And I hope that my many friends who are LGBT will at last understand where I'm coming from.

Finally, know this: sex is a sacred, holy thing.  It is something that I believe should be celebrated within the boundaries of husband and wife.  In my sincere philosophy ALL sexual sin is equally abhorrent.  I can not disapprove of LGBT behavior any more than I can of sex outside of marriage.  That makes me come across as a prude, I know.  But there it is.  I have plenty of friends who do not agree with this.  And that is fine.  But so far as I know none of them have called me "hate-filled" or "polygamaphobe" because of it.

Sex is not a toy.  It's not something to be engaged in frivolously.  It is meant to be a sanctified act.  "The marriage bed is to be honored by all," scripture tells us.  If that was done more often, maybe we wouldn't have things like children without fathers, venereal disease and shortened lifespans.

That is all.



Saturday, July 23, 2022

New post on Substack, about "groomers"

Still getting the hang of Substack, which may be a suitable repository for my more "political" essays.  This evening it's a post about the word "groomer", which has suddenly become quite unpopular on Reddit and other social media sites.  It is the belief of this blogger however that groomer is exactly the precise word to describe pedophiles who are determined to corrupt children...

My honeymoon with Twitter these past few months may soon be drawing to a close. In recent days the microblogging site has apparently cracked down on the use of the word “groomer”. Which has come to mean pedophiles brainwashing children into becoming potential targets for exploitation. Leftist activists claim that it’s a slur against homosexuals and transsexuals and should be banned as “hate speech”. Never mind that it can also mean things like dog groomer, “good grooming” etc.

It’s already verboten on Reddit: a site that for whatever reason I can’t remember looking at much less participated on. Maybe it had something to do with Reddit shutting down a subthingy in support of Donald Trump. So much for being a free and open forum of discussion and dialogue…

Back to grooming. I have no problem at all with using this word in referring to adults who introduce children - who are WAY too young for such concepts - to sexuality in general and the LGBTwhatever “lifestyle” in particular. Because “grooming” kids is exactly what is transpiring.

Mash down here for more.