Thursday, September 25, 2025
Thankful to God for my Tammy
Thursday, June 27, 2024
Power or Wisdom? Stop asking God to interfere with politics
In searching around for churches in this area, obviously I'm looking at their websites. I'm studying a few things, particularly their various statements of belief. In that regard I'll simply say this: there are already a number of places of worship which I regrettably cannot enter. It would be like bringing a blowtorch aboard the Hindenburg.
No disrespect to those places is meant. I believe they and I worship the same God. We differ however in aspects of that which while ultimately meaningless, are as unavoidable in this carnal realm as they are indicative of the imperfect nature of the church as the body of Christ upon this earth.
As I was saying, I'm perusing the websites of places of worship. Looking for certain qualities. And with the advent of streaming video I'm now able to watch and listen to recent sermons. Sort-of like the Esper machine: getting to search a place without actually being there.
(Wait, did I just make a Blade Runner reference...?!?)
So a few nights ago, with nothing else to do (because of tech issues keeping me from my AI work, grrrr...) I was back at ogling church websites. I literally have told Google to search for "churches near me" and it produces a map with every place of worship and, if available, their website addresses. How convenient!
There is one church a few miles away from here that I didn't know anything about, other than it's a Baptist congregation unaffiliated with any larger contingent of the faithful. I read over the site, and didn't find anything that would be objectionable. It went down on my list of possible places to visit. And it would have likely stayed there until I got around to checking it out in person...
Then I watched this past Sunday's worship service and listened to the message being preached.
Folks, there are very few things that will have me more walking out, however impolite it may seem, than a sermon that turns blatantly political.
Especially as "conservative" as the message I listened to. Because conscientious conservatives really ought to know better.
The entirety of the pastor's message was about the evils of liberalism. I don't mean liberalism in the spiritual sense, which would have been fine and even expected to be touched upon at various times. No, I mean liberalism as in the temporal notion.
It was using the authority of the pastor to abuse the name of God for the furtherance of a political ideology. Something I have LONG believed is wrong.
So it is that this church gets a hard pass from me.
It's like this: I believe that each of us as citizens has the responsibility to choose our leaders in representative government. But it is WRONG for those with spiritual responsibility to decree who it is that his congregants should vote for. And that is what I saw in this message.
What should a pastor or other minister preach about politics, then? I do not believe the issue is completely off the table. I don't believe that the elders of yore would have thought so, either.
I also don't believe that it makes a difference to God as to who we ask Him to favor in our elections. Asking Him to please let Donald Trump win in November is going to mean as much to God as is asking Him to let the Patriots win another Super Bowl. Indeed it's even more ridiculous to ask Him to favor some candidates over others. Doing so would violate the concepts of free will and choice. God has given us choice all along. He has also given those of us in the free world the right to choose our leaders.
For good or ill, the onus is upon us, and not God, to well pick our representatives and executives.
So, if a minister has some authority to expound upon political matters, what is left if the endorsement of candidates is wildly inappropriate?
How about this instead: rather than trying to sway his listeners to vote either this way or that, a minister instead leads his flock in seeking WISDOM toward making their choices at the ballot box.
Isn't that what we as Christians should be seeking in all of our matters? That God might liberally (pun shamelessly intended) pour upon us the capacity to discern wisely and to act upon that wisdom with a resolute mind and determined will.
Should not that be what we are to pray for, instead of for our favorite candidates winning at the polls?
We can choose to have wisdom. Or we can choose to crave power. We have been doing the latter for so long that we've practically forgotten about wisdom at all. And we have suffered for that.
It is not God who has inflicted the metaphorical poxes upon our land. He is merely letting us have what we vote for. Free choice, remember?
I would posit that it has been a lack of lusting for wisdom which has brought America to the brink of calamity. And it has been many if not most of her Christians who have greatly encouraged that folly. It is the Christians of this land who should have been the very first to appeal to Heaven for wisdom and discernment. That is the vessel of true power. Not power itself, which we have deluded ourselves into believing we must wield.
Because in America at least, God has already granted her people all the power that they could possibly require. But how to exercise that power? That is something that we should have been petitioning God for all along.
Would it at all hurt us to start fervently oraying for change of hearts and minds instead of obsessively praying for change in Washington?
I know what is that I am praying for. And it is not for a candidate to win.
I will pray, that the people of this land lay aside their appetites for force and power. And instead that they would use the authority granted them with discernment and wisdom.
God WILL grant us those things, if we ask Him.
But He is not going to be moved when we ask Him to interfere directly with the politicks of these United States.
Tuesday, February 06, 2024
A meditation upon Matthew 7:7
Wednesday, January 31, 2024
God and mental illness: Why won't He heal my mind?
Obviously the notion entered my mind that maybe this could be an installment of the Being Bipolar series (which there may be much more material for coming soon). But Being Bipolar is more about the disease itself, and is intended to be a resource for those looking for insight and information from someone who lives with that condition.
What I'm sharing now, on the other hand, has less to do with that aspect of my life than it does with others. Although mental illness is certainly the precipitant.
It was twenty-four years ago this month that the symptoms of manic depression, or bipolar disorder, first began to manifest themselves in me. At first it was wildly intoxicating, all the boundless energy and creativity that came seemingly out of nowhere. I was still looking for a job post-college and failing in that but other opportunities were coming to the fore (like my time at Star Wars website TheForce.net, which gets a bit of interesting light shined upon it in the book I'm currently writing). Long story short, I was bouncing off the walls with enthusiasm and optimism and sheer drive. That those seemed to be peppered with moments of despair - like the horrible night that winter when I stripped off all my clothes and tried to freeze myself to death during a snowstorm with temperatures in the single digits - were inconsequential to how inflamed my uttermost being had become.
By early spring however, it was increasingly obvious that something was very, very wrong with me.
That was almost a quarter century ago. But it seems like only yesterday. In one way or another bipolar disorder has been in the background of everything that I have attempted or somehow accomplished despite the condition. It has factored into my relationships (one of which ended in divorce), in my career history, in my choice to leave my old hometown... there has not been a single aspect not impacted by manic depression.
And all along, there has been one question that has been most on my mind: Why did God let this happen to me?
Two and a half decades later, I'm no closer to understanding the reason than I ever was. But there has been a modicum of comfort to be drawn from scripture. Second Corinthians 12:9 has the apostle Paul sharing with us that God told him "'My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.'" Or as my Uncle Nub once told me: "Maybe God let you have it because He knew you could take it."
The verse continues: "Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me." Which dovetails well, I think, with Romans 8:28, a verse that a colleague quoted to me yesterday:
"And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose."
It has taken many years to come to this place, where I am no longer angry at God for allowing mental illness - something that at various times I have described as a "hell" - to strike me. I better understand now that this is still a fallen world, and not all the medication and counseling remotely possible is going to change that. I believe that God is the master Healer, and that there is no disease which is not without His power to alleviate.
But even so, disease happens. It can occur within anyone, with all its nefarious varieties. I suppose that I should consider myself blessed. In two months I turn fifty and at my last medical examination the doctor told me that I've the health of someone in his early thirties. Obviously God has let my physical well-being be good. That is more than a lot of guys in my demographics get to have. The only real physical malady I have is anemia, something that prevents me from being a blood donor anymore. Perhaps sooner than later we'll get to the bottom of what's causing it, because I hate being out of the running with my friends who contribute blood. But I digress...With time has come understanding, and I hope a little wisdom. And it has also brought with it an appreciation for my condition. Had the economy not taken such a turn downward I might still be enjoying a career as a full-time peer support specialist with the state's department of mental health. That is a job you literally must be crazy to have, I often tell those who don't know what peer support entails. I was someone who made use of experiences and intensive training toward helping other people, who also have mental illness, and letting them have a chance at full and meaningful lives. It was the most personally rewarding work that I have ever done and I would be doing it forever if that had been possible. I got to be of assistance to a lot of good people. Some of whom I still keep in touch with, just letting them know I still care about them.
Some people who God has placed in my path at times, have been close to giving it all up. Have gotten too close to the line separating want-to-live from I-want-to-die. I've been there too, more times than I can possibly count. And ironically I got to be the one who convinced them that their lives are worth living. I got to be someone who saw how precious their existences are, when they could not see it themselves.
It's possible that a lot of people wouldn't be with us still today, had it not been for God letting me have a mental illness that put me in their place first. But I don't say that to boast. God can be glorified in even our worst weaknesses. If some are still alive today, that's His doing and not mine. I'm just the instrument He chose to use.
And I can and will be thankful for that honor.
I guess the catalyst for this post is that, recently, I did something rather foolhardy and potentially very dangerous. I attempted to move out of the way of God from healing me. Or in other words: I tried to be made whole by faith only.
And so it is that I went a few days without my medication.
There wasn't any one agency that led me to attempt such a thing. At various times across the decades I've earnestly wondered if my faith in God was not enough: that maybe He would heal me if only I had more trust in Him.
I went off the meds and instead I threw myself into prayer and fasting. I turned toward immersing myself in scripture. I asked for prayers from others: something which has become a regular occurrence for me and indeed I do not believe that I would be here today were it not for prayers from people dear to me. I covet prayer now. Which is another irony, since once upon a time I would have likely laughed at such a notion.
I tried relying entirely on having faith in God, that He would deliver my mind from the torment of mental illness.
And in the end, He did not do that.
After two days being without the meds my thoughts began racing out of control, again. But I tried to endure. Sought to increase my faith. I want to think that my faith in Him is strong enough that it weathered the torture without ceasing to trust Him completely.
I went as far as could be tolerated before going back on the meds. Blessed relief arrived a few hours later.
So, once again, God did not heal me from bipolar disorder.
Or, maybe He did. Maybe He still is.
We are told that Luke, the writer of the eponymous gospel as well as the Book of Acts, was a physician. Doubtless he of all people understood the wondrous qualities of human health and self-care. I don't know what medications were available circa 60 A.D., apart from a form of aspirin known to the ancient Greeks. But Luke was in all likelihood well versed in their array and uses. God gave Luke a capable mind and adept hands to be a healer. Perhaps God was not dealing out divine intervention toward the healing of those in Luke's care, but He certainly was the ultimate Author of betterment and recuperation.
I have to believe that God gave us a beautiful thing in medical science. Something that can not so much replace God's place in healing as it does complement it. In the employ of those dedicated and devoted to the healing arts, medicine is by its very existence a miracle of God. In its purest form medicine is a thing wholly given over to the betterment of life.
I can't possibly contend that medical science is something God would not want us to make the most of, if it means having better and more purposeful life.
What about when medical science fails? I have friends who in recent weeks have each lost a loved one to disease. Is that a judgment against medicine when it could not prevent their respective passing? No, it is not. As I said before, it is a fallen world. Injury and illness have been a part of that imperfection for a very long time and barring God's intervention that doesn't look to change anytime soon. Nothing is guaranteed. We can only trust in God and His will, that things are going to work out for the best in the end. And that's the absolutely best answer that I can give. But I've seen His will work out well before. I have to believe that His will, will manifest itself as something that gives Him the glory and proves to be of benefit to us. God operates on a vaster scale of time than we can comprehend. And even the failures of the best of our schemes will serve to honor Him, in the end.
Personally, I believe that this lifetime isn't all that we get. There is more past that. What form that takes is up to the person living it. God knows who are His. For the one who loves God, this life and its afflictions are not the end. There is something better waiting for us still. I dream of having a mind that isn't plagued by mania or depression or sometimes both at once. That is coming, in the fullness of His time. And that is a great comfort.
I'm not going to willingly go off the medications again. I've tried trusting God to take my condition away from me. For whatever reason, He has not done that. But He has provided knowledge and wisdom and tools that can make the condition much more better manageable than it would be without those things. Here I am on the cusp of fifty, and with each passing day I feel more like what it is to not have a mind turned against itself. I feel younger today than I ever have, and it's because of what God has provided many scientists, researchers, and engineers with over the course of the centuries and especially the past several decades.
But of course, it never hurts to pray too.
Monday, October 30, 2023
God, sacrifice, and Yoda
Sunday, June 03, 2018
To father a child: do I have that right?
Monday, November 24, 2014
Taking Dad to the edge of the Jordan
| Mom and Dad's grave site, the morning after Dad's funeral |
The service was, well... spot-on perfect. It was a time rife with tales from the life of Robert Rankin Knight. One of the officiating ministers was particularly fond of the time two and a half years ago when Dad (during his and Uncle Frank's epic/crazy cross-country drive to Arizona) was pulled over for speeding in west Texas. We still don't know what he was clocked doing, except that the speed limit was 80 MPH. Somehow Dad got off with a warning after chatting with the patrolman about his knifemaking. That was Dad awright: a peaceful demeanor and cheerful talking can go far.
As I said, the service could not have been better. Everything about it was a true testament to his memory. Something about having two Methodist ministers and a Holiness-turned-Baptist-turned-Presbyterian pastor officiating made it so right, somehow. Dad always said he wanted "Go Rest High On That Mountain" by Vince Gill played at his funeral, and Anita's two friends from her church did an amazing rendition of that song. I'm also glad that before the service, those who came got to see the memorial video that Wilkerson Funeral assembled. So many moments from such a beautifully-lived life.
But it was what came after the service, as we were on the way to the graveside ceremony, that impressed my heart with how much God blessed our lives with Dad, and how He is continuing to bless our lives, and my own especially. Even when I spoke a few words about Dad during the service, somehow I didn't see ALL of the people who were packed inside the church. That came later, when our family was in the limo and watching everyone file out of the church, and then as we met in the fellowship hall following the interment. Words fail to convey how much my heart jumped to see Melody Hallman Daniel - AKA "Frannie Filks" from our movie Forcery - and her mother. Denise, I am so very moved that you and Nick could come and join the celebration of Dad's life. Ed Woody and Chad Austin: my brothers... Dad loved you as if you were his own sons.
To each of you and more who came to the funeral, who came to the visitation, who came to visit with us at the home during the past few days, who kept my family in their prayers thank you for honoring him with your presence: on behalf of my family, you haven no idea how exceedingly grateful we are for taking the time to be with us.
I will confess something: I am scared. I don't know what I'm doing, it seems like. But in the past several days God has been showing me that just as much as He blessed me with the greatest father that anyone could ever have, He has also blessed me... and is STILL blessing me... with the most wonderful friends and family that anyone could have in this world. We are told to lean not on our own understanding, to trust God with all our heart instead. We are also told that we don't have to see the entire road ahead: that His word is a light unto our feet and a lamp unto our path. In these past three weeks and in the last several days, God has demonstrated in too many ways to count that He IS with us. That He is with me, no matter how far I have felt from Him. He has brought me this far. Maybe He will bring me a little further still.
Yesterday, we said farewell to Dad. But this was not goodbye, not really. This was a celebration of his life. Indeed, this was a celebration of what it means to HAVE life, and life abundantly. I am always going to miss Dad. As I sit in this house that is now suddenly my own, only now is his absence beginning to impress itself upon me. But I also know that Dad would want me to keep moving forward, to always be thankful for what God has given me, to "think positive" (as he often told me), and to cherish those who God has placed into my life.
Just as Dad was all of those things and more.
To all of those who have held up my family in their thoughts and prayers during these very trying past 19 days, to those who offered words of encouragement and edification, to those who have consoled our family and helped us in so many ways for the past three days, to those who came to honor the memory of Dad last night and this afternoon, to all of those and many, many more...
Thank you.
Monday, August 12, 2013
Father Dowling, mystery no more: Priest of Missouri accident comes forward
One of the more intriguing stories last week was that of the mysterious priest who arrived on the scene of a vehicular accident in Missouri. 19-year old Katie Lentz was on her way to church when a drunk-driver smashed her car. Emergency workers tried for more than an hour to get Lentz clear of the wreck and it looked like she wasn't going to make it. Just then a Catholic priest appeared, anointed Lentz with oil and prayed with her. It was very soon after that firefighters and EMTs got Lentz out and flown to a hospital. And the priest? He vanished before anyone had a chance to thank him for being there.
Curiously, he didn't turn up in any of 90-some photos that were made of the crash site. Between that and the effect he seemed to have on everyone involved, many have wondered if it was an angel who came to Katie Lentz's assistance.
![]() |
| Father Patrick Dowling |
Though the highway was blocked off, “I did not leave with the other cars,” Fr. Dowling commented. He parked as close as he could, “and walked the remaining 150 yards. I asked the Sheriff if a priest might be needed … on checking, he permitted me to approach.”Something I couldn't help but appreciate: Father Dowling reported that he administered the Catholic sacraments of Anointing of the Sick and Absolution to Katie Lentz. Which would be routine for a priest "except that there was something extraordinary it sounds like, in the sequence of events that coincided in time with the Anointing. You must remember, there were many people praying there, many, many people... and they were all praying obviously for healing and for her safety.”
“When the young lady asked that I pray her leg stop hurting, I did so. She asked me to pray aloud and I did briefly … the rescue workers needed space, and would not have appreciated distraction. I stepped to one side and said my rosary silently until the lady was taken from the car.”
Once Lentz was removed from her vehicle, he explained, “I then shook hands with the Sheriff, and thanked him, as I left. I have to admire the calmness of everybody involved.”
The thing is, according to news articles from the past week, Lentz worships at an Assemblies of God congregation. She isn't Roman Catholic. Neither does it sound like the denominational background of anyone involved was ever questioned or commented upon. It was one person who happened to be a follower of Christ being at the scene to minister to another follower of Christ when she needed it most.
There are no doubt some who are going to be disheartened to discover that it wasn't a real angel who came to the side of Katie Lentz and those working to save her life, but rather a very human priest. But that doesn't mean that it wasn't a miracle.
Miracles don't have to be shimmering demonstrations of supernatural wonder and glory. Do I believe that God allows miracles to happen? I absolutely do. Even today. And some of them are of the sort that one can't readily explain away. Believe me, I've tried.
But that isn't what most miracles are. A miracle is God letting things "click" into place, at precisely the right time. And Father Dowling's being on the highway that close to the accident is as much a miracle as any miracle out of the New Testament.
Personally, I take great comfort in knowing that it was Father Patrick Dowling who came to Katie Lentz's aid. Because if God can use one of His mortal flock to work a miracle through, He can do the same with any other. Including you. Perhaps even me...
Friday, August 09, 2013
Who was that priest? Miracle and mystery on a Missouri highway
Everybody at the scene, from firefighters to police paramedics to the victim herself, saw him and heard him.
His calming words and peaceful demeanor are being credited with saving the life of a 19-year old young woman.
But he is nowhere to be found in any of the nearly 70 photographs taken at the site of the accident.
Neither can anyone figure out how he could have been there to begin with, since the road was blocked for two miles by police on both sides of the wreck. There were no parked cars. There were no pedestrians seen approaching the site, either walking along the road or coming across the fields along Highway 19 near Center, Missouri.
He disappeared before anyone could thank him.
And yet he was there. His presence is being called a miracle. And many are wondering if the person - who seemed to be a black-garbed silver-haired Catholic priest in his fifties or sixties - might have been an angel.
![]() |
| Katie Lentz: Attended by an angel? |
Firefighters and paramedics struggled to free Lentz from the twisted metal. Despite her circumstance, Lentz spoke with her rescuers about her church and her plans to study dentistry. But after an hour and a half of desperately trying to get Lentz out, it was clear that her vital signs were rapidly fading and that there was very little that could be done. It did not appear that she would survive.
That is when Katie Lentz asked the emergency workers around her for a moment of prayer. And that's when he appeared. Out of nowhere. Literally.
The priest approached Lentz and anointed her with oil he was carrying. He prayed with her and with the emergency workers and apparently anointed at least two of them as well. Chief Raymond Reed of the New London, Missouri Fire Department later said that "a sense of calmness came over her, and it did us as well. I can't be for certain how it was said, but myself and another firefighter, we very plainly heard that we should remain calm, that our tools would now work and that we would get her out of that vehicle."
Lentz was soon afterward finally extracted and evacuated by helicopter to a hospital. She has suffered several broken ribs, a broken wrist, and both legs have multiple fractures. But she is alive and poised to make a strong recovery.
And the priest? He vanished. No one saw him leave, just as no one saw how he could have possibly arrived.
Of all the photographs taken at the site of the crash, the priest is found in none of them. Neither have inquiries with the Catholic churches in the area turned up anything about who he could have been. Lentz's family and the rescuers at the scene would like to find him and thank him for his prayer and encouragement. But whoever he is, he has not stepped forward.
It is an absolutely fascinating and beautiful story and there is plenty more at the Mail Online's article about it.
So... could it be that an angel came to the aid of Katie Lentz and those attempting to free her from the wreck? Hebrews 13:2 tells us that we have sometimes "entertained angels unawares".
Perhaps it was a messenger of God who brought divine assistance to Highway 19.
Personally, it wouldn't surprise me in the least. I've seen more than a few things along the way that I can't possibly explain. Things which defy all notion of a rational basis. And I've had to learn - some would add "the hard way" and not without merit - to stop looking for a rationale behind any of them. "There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in our philosophy," the Bard observed.
There are some things which one has to stand back and accept them for what they are, without any expectation of answers or understanding. This mysterious priest, I would remark, is one of those.
And no matter one's faith or even lack of one, it has to be said: our lives are all the more rich because of them.
Thursday, July 04, 2013
A pledge against allegiance to man
This is a choice which I have abided for nearly a year. At various times I have felt led to articulate my reasons for doing so. Indeed, this past fall a friend helped me to record a video about my decision to never again say the Pledge of Allegiance (we filmed it at Guilford Courthouse Battleground, in front of the statue of General Nathaniel Greene, for what it’s worth).
Recent events have brought me to a place where at last I am compelled to write about why I’m not only refraining from the Pledge of Allegiance, but have come to see it as representing too much of what is wrong with America, and even in dire opposition to the vision of the Founders.
I first learned the Pledge of Allegiance in elementary school. At that age, one absorbs and trusts everything the teachers expects one to learn. For years, decades even, I spoke the words without really knowing what they meant, much less where they came from. In fact, how many Americans do know where the Pledge came from?
I didn’t know until about ten years ago, and that was the beginning of my questioning the Pledge and whether, as a follower of Christ and a citizen of this country, it was something I should invoke.
The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy: a socialist, and arguably a racist and anti-Catholic. But none of those are germane to my individual illumination about the Pledge. Neither is it that Bellamy wrote the Pledge of Allegiance as part of a marketing scheme for Youth’s Companion magazine to sell thousands of American flags to schools throughout the country.
No, what aroused my conscience most was that Bellamy – a Baptist minister by trade, incidentally – wanted the Pledge to convey and instill the concept that obedience to country and government is a “virtue”.
I do not believe that. I do not believe that at all. Because that runs fully against the meaning of the Constitution of the United States: a contract which establishes a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
Bellamy – as too many Christians do today – interpreted Jesus’ instruction to “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” (Matthew 22:15-22, Mark 12:13-17, Luke 20:20-26) to mean that Christians must be completely subservient to temporal government. I have heard many insist that to disobey government in any way is to disobey, disparage and disrespect God. So ingrained and unquestioned is this position that I have even heard of a minister who said he must allow his wife to be raped within his own house by federal agents, if they were to so intrude upon his home.
What is neglected or forgotten or ignored is what Jesus was teaching about responsibility to God. Jesus wasn’t telling His followers to obey man’s government without question. That would have put Him falling into the trap set by the Pharisees. His reply was something that hurt far more. He reminded the Pharisees and those of the law that because they had not rendered unto God first, they had to render unto Rome. The people of Israel were under the yoke of a foreign power when they could have instead been a free nation under the God of their forefathers.
Some Christians in this nation don’t want to understand that. But it’s true: there is no “Caesar” in America. If there was, We the People murdered him and took his place, with the blessings of Providence
How is it that we have resurrected Caesar? Are we now like the children of Israel, who cried at Moses to lead them back into the “safety” of bondage to Pharaoh? Trusting not in God but in a government wrought with corruption?
I don’t mean “imperfection”. No government under this sun is going to be perfect, and it would be the height of arrogance to think otherwise. I’m talking corruption. Power without restraint. Power for sake of power, eager and willing to waste and devour and murder to maintain that power. To remain in control.
Read the words of the Pledge of Allegiance:
“I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
I can’t speak those words anymore, because those are the words of a colossal lie.
The United States is not a republic. It hasn’t been for a very long time. The citizens of America haven’t been in control of their own destinies for decades. It is now a government grown too big, too powerful, too corrupt. And corruption looks after itself. The professional politicians. The “journalists” lusting to be within the spheres of influence more than the pursuit of truth. The “academics” who sacrifice education to indoctrination. The unethical among corporations and banks who exploit the system entrusted them to steal billions of dollars... and when found out, use their pull to create new exploits, still.
This is a country whose laws now protect the corrupt from the innocent, and not the innocent from the corrupt.
It is insanity that a free people could ever give such as these, and far too many more, their absolute trust and loyalty. And yet, we have. We have witnessed it and witness it anew every day. And it matters not in the slightest which “party” is in control of this or that branch of government. The American people have suffered at least... at least... twenty years and counting of the most incompetent, the most selfish, the most freedom-loathing, and the most destructive executive leadership in United States history. From the Oval Office on down, we have come to be “represented” by the self-serving, the narcissistic, the soulless and the mad.
Don’t believe me? Read the headlines of the past few months. The Internal Revenue Service is revealed to be a weapon against those who would challenge the status quo. Our private communications, our finances and even our medical records are now being monitored by people we will never know and will never see. Searches now happen on a “hunch”, not with a warrant. We are now forced to have our DNA testify against ourselves in court of law. Pointing a finger and making “bang-bang” sounds has become grounds to arrest a kindergartner. Our borders are allowed to be overrun by the very officials who swore to defend and maintain them. And now, judges and justices have taken it upon themselves to redefine an institution held sacred throughout six thousand years and more of human history and tradition.
For all of these things and more, there will be consequences. If not in our own lifetime then in that of our children, and their children’s children. “Liberty and justice for all” doesn’t exist anymore. And if not for us now, then how can we look our offspring in the eye and still promise them these things?
That is what our government across this land has become: a force unto itself, bereft of restraint from its people. And that is something that I will not now and will never again pledge allegiance to. My allegiance must ever be to God, and to then serve others as He would lead me to do. If that requires violating the rulings and legislations of mere men, then I will do so and suffer the consequences.
I can respect and appreciate what the Flag of the United States is supposed to represent. But I will not yield my morals and my conscience to those who would wield that same flag against myself, my family and my posterity.
If I am to have a pledge, it will be a pledge which I make according to the dictates of my conscience, of what was intended by those who came before, and of the necessity of a law higher than that of man.
If I am to pledge to something, it will be toward that which was once part of what made America good, and could make it good again.
And this is now my pledge...
Pledge of Adherence
"I pledge adherence to the Constitution of the United States of America, to steward authority (God) entrusted the people from whom the Republic derives its consent, and to uphold the blessings of liberty for all."
Whether one chooses to use the word "God", I left as a matter of personal preference. In my own case, I believe that God did give the authority of this nation to its people, and not to its government, and so I do include "God" when I have said this pledge. But regardless of preference, the Constitution has made clear in no uncertain terms that it is the people from whom authority stems in the United States.
There it is. I don't care what anybody else thinks of it, or thinks of me for composing it or what led me to write it to begin with. Neither could I think any less of any person who choose to still use the Pledge of Allegiance, if that is how his or her own conscience leads them.
All I ask is that each of you reading this not take what this world presents you at face value. That, and to never cease in applying your mind, your spirit, and your body toward the vigilance that our freedom... which too many fought and died for us to enjoy... is due.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
"Who are we to You?"
And of all the wonder that is to be found in Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life, this is the scene that has most entranced and enchanted me.
As I wrote after watching it then, this is a movie that dares to ask God "Why?", before providing the same reply that God gave to Job.
Now that the thought occurs to me, I might even suggest watching The Tree of Life after studying the Book of Job from the Old Testament. Yeah: read everything from the beginning, on through Job losing all but his life and then to the monologues by his friends (some help they were!) and exactly before hitting the point where God comes in to answer Job, go to this scene in The Tree of Life and let that paraphrase what God says.
What God has said to Job and to every one of us who has demanded of Him, "Answer me."
The music is "Lacrimosa" by composer Zbigniew Preisner. And as soon as I find the CD of it I am absolutely putting it on my iPod.
Just felt like posting something beautiful at this late hour...
Monday, September 24, 2012
Guilty as charged
Chris, just wanted to let you know that I am de-friending you because basically you are not a friend. Like most other "christians" I know, you seem to be two-faced and unreliable... my "christian" friends seem to be about the most worthless and unreliable of any that I have. I have atheist and agnostic friends who I trust implicitly. At least you've shown me that "christians" truly are a lying, two-face bunch of hypocrits.That was written by someone who I have known for over thirty years. I cannot be responsible for the choice that this person has made in severing our relationship.
But it is true: I am a hypocrite.
So is every other Christian. Every Christian who sincerely lives and strives to put God first and foremost in his or her life will admit to it, at least. And I would dare say that every Christian who ever lived has been a hypocrite in one way or another. Sometimes in plenty of ways... and I'll admit to being more guilty than most on that charge, too.
Yes, Christians are hypocrites. We are sometimes two-faced and we can be especially unreliable! We even lie sometimes. In short: we are every bit as stupid, scurillous and scoundrelous as any other human being. That we dare to be so ridden with faults while yet claiming to follow One who lived perfectly makes us out in the eyes of many as being the worst of low-life scum.
I know that I am a hypocrite. In more ways than I want to share here.
But neither am I afraid to admit that I am a hypocrite. And so long as I find myself convicted of hypocrisy... which will be until the final breath leaves my lungs in this fallen world... I will continue to confess that flaw in my character.
I am a hypocrite. But it is not what I want to be. And the only hope I have of being sanctified is to continually surrender that frailty to God.
Yes, those who seek mercy from God will be granted mercy. I have no reason to doubt that those who are secured in Him will remain secure forevermore. But rather than being reason to rest from our nature, to orient one's heart toward Christ entails the life-long process of sanctification... and as I have discovered during my own faith journey, that becomes the most difficult and painful part of all in this path we have chosen.
Why must it be so? I have thought about that much over the years. And nothing else makes as much sense as this:
That knowing how frail and fallen we are, we as Christians are not to persuade others to become Christians. We are however meant to persuade others of Christ. And there is no greater way than to show His work - that which is finished and that which He is still accomplishing - in our lives.
If evidence is demanded for conviction, then I will gladly plead guilty every time.
Friday, July 13, 2012
Saturday, December 17, 2011
A response to a challenge on baptism
"Chris you are WRONG. Baptism is required for salvation! Acts 2:38 has Peter commanding that we be baptized FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS. Mark 16:16 commands baptism and without it we are damned."There was more to it but that's the heartmeat of this individual's contention. I don't know what precipitated this correspondence. Maybe it was the "Meditation on Baptism" post nearly three years ago. Maybe it was one of the numerous posts I've had to make about a certain cult operating in this area: a group that has among other things harassed others who have met to worship in peace.
Okay, fine. I'll respond to it.
Here is Acts 2:38, as translated in the 1611 Authorized Version (AKA the King James Bible):
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
For all the beauty of the King James Version, it is rife with problems. Those stem from two primary factors: that the Authorized Version was a project that King James used to placate the Puritan faction of the Church of England (i.e. it was a political stunt, plain and simple) and the fact that the primary source material of Greek manuscript for the Authorized Version was apparently the Textus Receptus of Desiderius Erasmus. Now, Erasmus was otherwise a brilliant scholar, no doubt about it. But the Textus Receptus was hands-down his sloppiest piece of work ever (he was rushing to win a contest... and he didn't have that many manuscripts to draw from to begin with). Combined with the aforementioned purpose of affirming in approved canon the doctrines and ordinances of the Church of England over all others and you get the idea of what is wrong with the King James Version (though I still love the overall beauty of its language).
But anyhoo, let's look at the passage that this reader (and others) have attempted to use to insist that water baptism is necessary for salvation: "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins..." I emphasized the word "for" because in the Greek the original word is "eis". And "eis" does NOT easily translate into "in order to receive..." Rather, the more accurate rendition is "because of".
So let's translate Peter's statement again, this time with "eis" correctly translated...
"Then Peter said unto them: Repent, and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ because your sins have been remitted."That makes much more sense. It also reconciles that bit of scripture with the story of Cornelius, the first Gentile to become a Christian (recorded in Acts 10) who along with his household had already believed in Christ. That Peter baptized them was outward affirmation that Christ came for all nations, and not merely the Jewish people (per the vision that he received as recorded earlier in the chapter). Here also, we find that baptism is not for salvation, but is rather for all of those who are already in Christ and His church.
That might seem a small matter today, but in those heated days of the early church the issue of non-Jewish converts to the Way (as Christianity was called in the beginning) was a serious controversy. Peter baptizing Cornelius and his family was a threshold moment for Christianity. They were baptized because they had faith in Christ and because of that faith, their sins were already forgiven. Hence, they were fully entitled to baptism, without any regard whatsoever for their nationality.
So that takes care of Acts 2:38. But what about Mark 16:16? Here is what that passage has Jesus telling His followers...
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.Y'all want the "nice" reason first why this verse doesn't mean that baptism is a requisite for salvation, or do you want the "nasty" reason?
Fine. I'll start off polite. Here it is: this verse does not say at all that the absence of baptism equals damnation. It only states that "whoever does not believe will be condemned". Downright obvious, actually.
But here's the biggest reason why Mark 16:16 can not be used to claim that baptism is a requirement for salvation...
Mark 16:16 doesn't belong in the Bible to begin with.
Feel free to read that again after you've come down from the initial shock.
The Gospel of Mark is apparently the oldest of the four gospels, perhaps composed only about 35 years or so after General Titus and his boys laid waste to Jerusalem and the Temple there. But of all the oldest manuscripts that we have for Mark's book, none of them contain verses 9 through 20 of Chapter 16! The last thing that can credibly be ascribed to the Gospel of Mark is that "...the women went out and fled from the tomb. They said nothing to anyone, because they were afraid." And if you only have the King James Version to go on, it jumps from there to a sudden re-introduction of Jesus and an ending that is wildly different from the context of the rest of Mark's writing.
Long story short: Mark 16:16 and everything else from 16:9 onward is a later addition. Much later. Perhaps by a century or so. I've tried to find anything that demands why these verses do belong in Mark but as of yet, such justification has eluded me. If anyone has something that I might have missed, leave a comment here or shoot me an e-mail at theknightshift@gmail.com.
Does that mean that your friend and humble blogger is committing sacrilege by ignoring part of the Bible? Nope, not at all. Indeed it is quite the opposite: I am striving for nothing more and nothing less than to understand what the Word of God does teach, in spite of all that man has inevitably attempted to do with it during these two millenia out of either well-meaning or malicious intent.
And however one chooses to adhere to the matter of baptism, it must be acknowledged by all that the endurance of the Word of God - the Truth of God, of which the verbiage of scripture can be but a rough covering - is in and of itself nothing short of a miracle.
Friday, December 16, 2011
Christopher Hitchens has passed away. And some words for more than a few fellow Christians...
The sad news broke early this morning that Christopher Hitchens, the celebrated, provocative and brilliant journalist/essayist, has passed away at the age of 62 following a battle for the past year and a half with cancer of the esophagus.
Even when I disagreed with Hitchens - and those times were numerous - I had to have grudging respect for the man, because it can't be said that he lacked consistency. He was one of the rare writers in this day and age who strove in his craft not for sake of political or ideological favor, but instead for nothing more or less than understanding of the human condition and its derivative culture.
Here is Hitchens' final essay for Vanity Fair, appearing in next month's issue. In it he wrestles with thoughts of his own mortality and determination of spirit.
And now, there is something that I feel led to say to too many of those who, like myself, profess to follow Jesus Christ...
To be blunt: I am very disappointed with a lot of you.
Yes, Christopher Hitchens was an avowed atheist. But even so: I'm not going to judge the man. And neither should anyone else. Yeah that means YOU too!
What is it about Christianity that seems to bring out the smugness and arrogance in some people? Especially when the choice to follow Christ at all is supposed to stem from an acknowledgement that we ourselves are not worthy of being in His kingdom... nay, of being anywhere within His sight, even!
Yet God loves us so and through Christ has adopted us into His realm. That should be cause enough for joy unceasing. And yet there are far too many Christians for whom that is not enough. For them, Heaven isn't sweet unless they know with absolute certainty that there is at least one poor miserable soul roasting in Hell for eternity. Based on what I've been seeing around the Intertubes since this morning, that particular soul of the day is Christopher Hitchens.
I honestly don't know who to feel more sorry for: a man who wrote that he did not believe in God, or a person who claims belief in God while literally gloating that someone else chose to be separated from that very God for all time.
I am in no position to judge the soul of Christopher Hitchens. But I can assert that based on what I have read of him and found in his writings, that he was an individual who not only struggled with the idea of God, but perhaps had more reasons than most to endure that struggle at all. That he chose to be open and even brazen about it does not befit one who is necessarily comfortable with the notion of there being no God. Rather it seems more that Hitchens was searching for a rationale for God's existence. And indeed, in recent months he had even begun to question his atheism within his essays.
I can't believe that God can't honor that. As our Lord Himself declared...
"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you."And we should be thankful that the matter of our own salvation is not dependent upon the understanding of other men!-- Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 7, Verse 7
Because in the end, Christopher Hitchens was a frail man who did not possess fulness of wisdom and understanding. He was a person who was imperfect and had fallen short of the glory of God.
Aren't we all?














